A U.S. judge rules that Subway can be sued over its '100% tuna
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
The case centers on what consumers expect when they order a tuna sandwich: the word "tuna" appears 244 times in the plaintiff's 28-page amended complaint.
The case centers on what consumers expect when they order a tuna sandwich: the word tuna appears 244 times in the plaintiff's 28-page amended complaint.
The case centers on what consumers expect when they order a tuna sandwich: the word tuna appears 244 times in the plaintiff's 28-page amended complaint.
Subway tuna sandwiches contain no identifiable tuna DNA, New York Times investigation finds
Judge rules Subway can be sued over tuna claims
A U.S. judge rules that Subway can be sued over its '100% tuna' claim : NPR
Lawyers Drop Claims of “No Tuna” in Subway's Tuna Sandwiches – Mouse Print*
Subway tuna lawsuit has been dismissed
Subway's tuna sandwiches don't contain tuna, new lawsuit claims
A U.S. judge rules that Subway can be sued over its '100% tuna' claim : NPR
Subway tuna samples contain chicken, pork and cattle DNA, claims amended lawsuit - The Washington Post
Subway calls fake tuna suit a big fish story
New lawsuit against Subway accuses it of duping the public about its '100% tuna
Subway's Tuna Isn't Actually Tuna, Lawsuit Again Alleges - WSJ
Lab analysis of Subway's tuna sandwiches fails to identify tuna DNA for SECOND time
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(761x476:763x478)/subway-split-ea0124e8484247d5971da167173db506.jpg)
